So, I saw a couple of recent ScienceBlogs posts that got me thinking. The first was Orac's post on the germ-theory-denialism of Robert O. Young
here, and the second was on Gene Expression about a study showing conservatives have more fear,
here. It got me thinking about the alt-health mindset, and why to me it seems similar to the neocon mindset, and the fundamentalist-religious mindset, and why it all might in fact be lumped together as a general
denialist mindset.
To me, the biggest, brightest, warm-fuzziest perk of atheism and a science-based world view is
freedom from fear. Oh, sure, I still worry some, but not NEARLY like I used to. Back when I was a mystic, devoutly religious Wiccan priestess, alt-med, tarot-card-reading person, I lived with a constant background radiation of fear. When I accepted that the universe is a place where random stuff happens to everyone, I breathed a lot freer, a lot easier, than I did when I thought OMG MY REALITY IS BEING CREATED BY MY EVERY THOUGHT AND ANY TINY NEGATIVE THOUGHT COULD BRING DISASTER DOWN UPON ME!!!! I'm certain many conservative religious folks feel this way-- that their random thoughts of sin might bring down God's wrath. I know for a fact that people who buy into alternative medicine and diet woo worry that any stray thought of disease or negativity might bring them sickness.
There was a time, I hate to admit it, when I wanted to be a naturopathic doctor. I worked for years in a health food store which sold bulk herbs, herbal and vitamin supplements, homeopathic tinctures, ayurvedic remedies, and Deepak Chopra books. Based on my experience of the alternative health community, I would say that a lot of the behaviors I observed within it stem from the inability to accept the randomness of disease. Just like a religious fundamentalist who cannot accept random badness happening to good people and thinks those hurricane/tsunami/famine/AIDS/Holocaust victims must've
done something to bring it down on themselves, the alternative health creed is,
"Must be the sick person's fault." This leads them to blame the victims of illness, and of course themselves should they get sick. In the case of a progressive disease like cancer, it leads them to deeper and deeper denial of its progression. In the case of a self-limiting illness like a cold, they just attribute the "cure" to that which reinforces their cherished belief-- the alternative remedy, rather than the self-limiting nature of the disease itself! Nutrition woo is much the same-- do this or that diet! Take this or that vitamin! If you miss something important you'll get sick!!! Again, they lay the blame at the feet of the sufferer for his non-compliance with their dogma.
Subscription to this mindset can be falsely empowering. I say "falsely" because all it does is give the illusion of power and control over one's circumstances. But illusion is all it is-- it does nothing to help one come to grips with the simple fact of life that one can do everything "right" and still have misfortune strike. The greatest harm of this mindset is that it does not lend itself to
asking for help at all-- much less from the right sources: medical doctors. That would be a repudiation of the subscriber's entire world-view, an admission of their own negativity... and an admission that their faith isn't strong enough. It's all a misguided attempt to control the uncontrollable variables in life and death. It's all, ultimately, about fear.
Sometimes fears can be overcome through education. For instance, I used to be afraid of new technology, because I was slow to understand gadgetry of all sorts. But once I finally threw myself into a computer class, it was AWESOME!!! A whole new world opened up beneath my fingertips!!! Before long, I couldn't imagine life without a computer. But here's the key-- I was not very
invested in my techno-phobia. In fact, it was a pain and a nuisance. Thus, I could really
see the clear and immediate benefit of divesting myself of that troublesome belief-system (that technology wuz bad and scaryyyyyy!!!one1!). Yay, edumacation winz!!!
But... say a person is
so personally invested in a fear that they have based a chunk of their
identity on it. Probably that person lives squarely in Denialville and will fight tooth-and-nail for the belief that keeps them in its thrall,
even if it harms them in the long run. For example-- heavy sigh-- autism quackery. The parents who subscribe to thoroughly-debunked claims that vaccines cause autism, or mercury causes autism, or aluminum, or is it formaldehyde this week? These people are SO afraid-- and with the greatest of causes, the health of their beloved children!-- that all too often anything they learn is bent to rationalize their fears. It is difficult to evaluate evidence critically when they have already invested SO MUCH time, brainpower, social support (of other like-minded parents, a valuable social outlet and emotional support-system for the parents of disabled or different children), and yes, FEAR of the chemical agent in their pet hypothesis, be it thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, or whatever else the ever-shifting goalpost has moved to. But it leads them to accept treatments for their precious children which stand
absolutely no chance of helping them, and worse, will in many cases
hurt them... even
kill them. If they would read the science and REALLLY UNDERSTAND what it says, not just keep chewing over the regurgitations of Wakefield and the Geiers or "celebrities" like Jenny McCarthy, they would know the best way to help their children is NOT through chelation or lupron, nor through denying them vaccines. It's genetic! Really!!! It doesn't mean the child isn't AWESOME! My son is
the best thing that ever happened to me, and his quirky neurological functions are an integral, inseparable part of his charm! His brain is
who he is!!! But as Prometheus said in
this wonderful post which gave me the strength to finish writing this one, for some people, admitting this might mean they have to work harder to understand the child that nature has given them-- and to let go of their imaginings of what parenthood and family was "supposed" to be like. Some people never leave the denial stage of this process. It's easier for them to lay blame than to accept the randomness of life. But seeking comfort this way actively harms others--
measles is once again on the rise because of anti-vaccine hysteria, and valuable research dollars are being demanded to study spurious treatments that the overwhelming scientific evidence has
already deemed useless in treating autism!
I used to think the term "Enlightenment" was a facile label for a time-period that denigrated the accomplishments of all other centuries before it. But recently, I've grown to love the word. Like Carl Sagan said, science truly is a candle in the darkness of this demon-haunted world. It's the best lens we have through which to view and evaluate evidence. Critical thinking really is a light for dispelling the darkness of ignorance and fear.
I just wish it were contagious. *COUGH COUGH*